Sainsbury's strapline falls foul of ASA after Tesco complaint
Tesco has gained a victory against arch rival Sainsbury's after contacting the advertising watchdog and calling into question Sainsbury's 'Live Well For Less' strapline.
Tesco and some members of the public complained to the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) about claims that customers would not pay more for brands at Sainsbury's than they did at Asda or Tesco.
The objections were that claims in the TV, digital, press and email campaign were misleading, because the coupon customers received as part of Sainsbury's Brand Match campaign, confirmed they would have paid less for branded goods at Asda and Tesco.
Further complaints were raised because Sainsbury's implied in its advertising that the Brand Match scheme applied to all branded purchases, whereas it was in fact available only to customers who spent £20 or more.
The Brand Match scheme provides customers with a voucher equivalent to the amount they could have saved if they had bought their branded products at Tesco or Asda, but needs to be redeemed with a further purchase made within two weeks.
The ASA ruled that Sainsbury's use of its 'Live Well For Less' strapline in the Brand Match campaign, which was created by Abbott Mead Vickers BBDO, implied branded goods would be cheaper at Sainsbury's.
Sainsbury's defended itself by claiming that it was difficult to see how consumers would have the impression that it was claiming to be cheaper than Asda or Tesco, unless they ignored key parts of the ads.
It added that the use of 'Live Well For Less' was justified because its research found that customers could "live well for less than they thought at Sainsbury’s based on customer perception data".
Sainsbury's argued that the Brand Match campaign was "genuine, clear and concise" and had been well received with nearly 100 million coupons issued.
However, the ASA disagreed with Sainsbury's and has banned the campaign in its current form, for misleading customers.
The ad watchdog has warned Sainsbury's that future ads must not imply that consumers would not pay more or would save money by shopping at Sainsbury's, if that was not the case.
This article was first published on campaignlive.co.uk
- Sainsbury's grocery market share rises to highest level in almost a decade
- Sainsbury's poaches three senior figures to bolster marketing team
- ASA bans Mirror casino ad for appealing to children
- L'Oreal gets Dior mascara ad banned by watchdog
- Boots 'Little Me Organics' claim labelled 'misleading' by watchdog
- Homebase sale ad banned by watchdog for misleading promotion
- Sainsbury's sales 'outperform' market on back of own-label ranges
- Tesco profits drop 12.4% but Everyday Value boost sales
- Sainsbury's launches advertising joint venture with Nectar partner
- Tesco boss Clarke starts blog to build trust in brand
- Sainsbury's commits £1m to help disabled children as part of 2012 legacy
- Sainsbury's in £2m 'no need to shop around' push
- Digital Strategist The Little Black Book Agency £40000 - £50000 per annum, Manchester
- Senior Account Director Source £55000 - £60000 per annum, London
- Account Director - Senior Account Director Source £55000 - £60000 per annum, London
- Project Manager Source £45000 - £55000 per annum, London
- Shopper Marketing and Sales Promotion Account Handlers Source £30000 - £45000 per annum, London
- Blippar connects disjointed families, says MEC executive
- Fans take on Jo-Wilfried Tsonga in Twitter-powered tennis game
- Campaign Viral Chart: Samsung scores hat-trick in tech-heavy chart
- Jaguar readies global campaign for F-Type launch
- Samsung strikes placement deal with The Wanted
- ITV and Channel 4 insist they will beat declining ad market
Pinterest takes big step towards working with major brands
It marks Pinterest’s first step towards associating images directly with brands and could be the beginning of a change on the social network that sees it become a marketplace as well as a site where people pin ideas of things they like or that inspire them.