Pfizer follow-on baby milk ads banned by ASA
Pfizer has fallen foul of the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) over a campaign promoting its SMA Follow-on Milk, after the regulator deemed the ads misleading.
The poster, national and regional press campaign attracted 64 complaints, including challenges from Unicef, the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health and Baby Milk Action.
Three press ads and three poster ads each featured a real mother and baby.
For example, one execution said: "What's the best milk after Emma's?"
Each ad carried the SMA logo, a pack shot of its Follow-on Milk, a bubble containing the text: "6+ months", and a footnote stating: "Important Notice: SMA Follow-on Milk is for babies over six months and is not intended to replace breastfeeding. It should only be used as part of a varied weaning diet".
The ads also attributed to each of the mothers the claim that "the best milk after hers is SMA Follow-on Milk".
Complainants objected to the ads on the following counts – that they misleadingly implied that follow-on milk was the best alternative to breast milk and superior to other brands; that breastfeeding should stop at six months, and that the ads did not sufficiently distinguish between infant formula and follow-on formula, and could undermine breastfeeding.
Pfizer said it did not claim that SMA was the best alternative to breast milk or that it was superior to other brands, arguing that the ads asked an open question about which follow-on milk the mothers featured thought was best, adding that they were real people.
The ASA did not agree with Pfizer’s assertion that the mothers' claims in the ads were real testimonials, nor that consumers would infer that they were in response to an "open question".
It said that claims that the product was the best alternative to breast milk once breastfeeding had stopped, or that it was superior to other brands, were unsubstantiated by suitable evidence. The ASA concluded that the ads were misleading on those grounds.
On the other counts, the complaints were not upheld.
The ASA ruled that the ads must not appear in their current form again.
This article was first published on campaignlive.co.uk
- ASA ticks off Pepsi on-pack competition
- Homebase sale ad banned by watchdog for misleading promotion
- Burglar alarm firm evades complaints for hard-hitting ad
- ASA rejects Real Bread Campaign claims that Allinson misled consumers
- Ryanair 'cash passport' press ad is grounded
- Sky ad banned for exaggerated 'instant' movie claim
- ASA hands out second ban for promotional tweets
- Sid the Slug salt complaint knocked back by watchdog
- Digital Producer / Digital Project Manager - (Agency) Guru Careers £40-45k + Benefits, London (W11)
- Senior Account Director Blue Tree Recruits £46,000 to £52,000 per annum, Shere
- Qualitative Research Manager Morph Talent £30,000 - £40,000 Depending experience , NW1
- Account Executive Blue Tree Recruits Up to £25,000 depending on experience plus benefits, Putney Bridge
- Web Design Administrator Blue Tree Recruits £21,000 per annum, plus benefits, Woking
- Blippar connects disjointed families, says MEC executive
- Fans take on Jo-Wilfried Tsonga in Twitter-powered tennis game
- Samsung strikes placement deal with The Wanted
- Jaguar readies global campaign for F-Type launch
- Campaign Viral Chart: Samsung scores hat-trick in tech-heavy chart
- Proximity's Justin Vir joins Havas Worldwide London