Empty seats? Look beyond the brands to the bums of the 'Olympic family'
Sponsor-bashing is fast becoming as much of an Olympic sport as the main events. No sooner did news of empty seats at venues emerge, than the blame was pinned on sponsors.
The anger was fuelled when Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt said on Saturday, helpfully, that he 'thought' the empty rows were seats assigned to sponsors.
Several times this weekend I was accused of being an apologist as I defended sponsors on this issue; but what do sponsors have to apologise for? They have not been gifted these seats, but paid a heavy price tag in commercial deals set by LOCOG and the International Olympic Committee. The idea that sponsors would simply leave masses of valuable seats empty seems self-defeating.
LOCOG eventually tried to douse the flames, saying the bulk of the empty seats were for the ‘Olympic family’, which consists of international federations, national governing bodies, athletes, IOC officials and media.
Even as Sky reported that it was this ticket allocation that was leaving the embarrassing gaps, it did little to change the default view expressed by its audience. A significant chunk of the 200 comments that followed the online story slammed sponsors for their greed, and included threats to boycott their brands.
For some time now, there has been a collective call behind the scenes for LOCOG to defend sponsors more vigorously. Its belated efforts to deflect blame appear to be too little, too late.
Par for the course
As McDonald’s chief executive Jill McDonald admits, negative press is to be expected when you are a polarising brand, but it is consumer sentiment that matters in the long run. P&G’s global brand building officer, Marc Pritchard, is also confident that consumers will ‘feel better about the company’ when they find out it is behind the brands that provide support for athletes’ families through its P&G ‘Family Home’ in London.
If the opening weekend is anything to go by, however, sponsors are not going to have an easy ride over the remaining two weeks. Forging links with consumers by highlighting the distinct benefits that sponsors bring to the Olympics is what will define a successful Games for brands.
Rachel Barnes (Rachel.Barnes@haymarket.com) is deputy editor of Marketing. Noelle McElhatton is away.
This article was first published on marketingmagazine.co.uk
- Hunt ploughs £10m into tourism marketing to 'turbo-charge' industry
- McDonald's responsive Olympic campaign airs with fans' footage
- Coca-Cola chief counters Olympic seats issue
- Non-sponsors rein in London 2012 adspend
- Samsung among brands with fleeting roles in Opening Ceremony
- Olympic sponsors deny being at fault for empty seats
- Adidas and EDF join top sponsors in waiving Olympic sponsor tax break
- Digital Strategist The Little Black Book Agency £40000 - £50000 per annum, Manchester
- Senior Account Director Source £55000 - £60000 per annum, London
- Account Director - Senior Account Director Source £55000 - £60000 per annum, London
- Project Manager Source £45000 - £55000 per annum, London
- Shopper Marketing and Sales Promotion Account Handlers Source £30000 - £45000 per annum, London
- Blippar connects disjointed families, says MEC executive
- Fans take on Jo-Wilfried Tsonga in Twitter-powered tennis game
- Campaign Viral Chart: Samsung scores hat-trick in tech-heavy chart
- Jaguar readies global campaign for F-Type launch
- Samsung strikes placement deal with The Wanted
- ITV and Channel 4 insist they will beat declining ad market
Pinterest takes big step towards working with major brands
It marks Pinterest’s first step towards associating images directly with brands and could be the beginning of a change on the social network that sees it become a marketplace as well as a site where people pin ideas of things they like or that inspire them.